Aspiring writers are often told to "write about things they know" and, following this advice, many authors don't think they need to do any research before they sit down to write. While this might be true for a completely autobiographical work, any author interested in writing more than one autobiography will rapidly realize that research is not only necessary but liberating.
After all, for a literate population, knowledge need not be first hand, and good research expands exponentially the topics that we can write about without violating the rule to "write about things you know." The fact is, most of what we “know” we have learned indirectly either formally or
informally. We have listened to experts in the classroom, attended lectures and
seminars, and taken part in discussions and private conversations. We have read
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and books. We’ve seen documentary
films and TV programs. If we want to learn about a specific topic and become experts in it, we can. For a novelist, this means that “writing about what you
know” need not mean writing about your own experiences, but rather writing
about places, periods, professions, and events that you have thoroughly and
professionally researched.
The operative phrase here is "thoroughly and professionally researched." Reading one article, watching one TV program or making a quick check of "the facts" on wikipedia does not qualify. If you’re going to write a book about a fireman in
New York on September 11, 2001, then you better carefully research everything
about the New York Fire Department’s organization, equipment, social structure,
and internal culture as well as the
exact timing, sequence and impact of each terrorist attack.
Keep in mind that good research does not interfere with a book, but rather
enhances it. It provides the background
and context for the story; it lends the book authenticity. If a book reads like
a device to lecture the reader on the technology or religion or social
structures of a different place or time, then the author has failed. But if a
book allegedly set in a different place or time is filled with anachronisms and inaccuracies, then the book is just a much a failure and no amount of
brilliance in delivery (style) can save it. Great
fiction must be both authentic and literary.
The temptation is to write quasi-autobiographical books, but that gets harder with each novel. It can be difficult to handle
a wide-range of themes, to develop significantly different plots and populate
the book with recognizably different characters, if the setting is always the
same.
The more difficult, but more rewarding, route is to do research and learn about different cultures, periods and places. If nothing else, you will be a better educated person, enriched by knowledge of things you could not have imagined so that, even if you write fantasy, you you find your imagination has been stimulated in new ways.
The more difficult, but more rewarding, route is to do research and learn about different cultures, periods and places. If nothing else, you will be a better educated person, enriched by knowledge of things you could not have imagined so that, even if you write fantasy, you you find your imagination has been stimulated in new ways.
No comments:
Post a Comment