English
teachers and other instructors of creative writing are in the habit of
telling aspiring young writers to “write about things you know.” There’s a good
reason for this. If they didn’t make this seemingly obvious suggestion, they
would have a lot of students coming to them for ideas or failing to write a
single sentence because they “didn’t know what to write about.”
The
problem with this practical piece of advice is that, while useful in the
classroom, it is too often transferred out of that context. “Writing about what
you know” is a way to get started. It is a way to practice and exercise, to
develop skill and style. It is not – repeat not - the finished
product.
A
finished product is a piece of writing that you wish to share with a wider
public than your teacher, classmates, close friends and relatives. And this is
where it is important to make a very important transition.
If
you are writing for public consumption – i.e. if you plan to publish in a
magazine, on the internet or to publish a book – then you should not confuse
“writing about things you know” with writing about yourself. Yes, if you’re already a celebrity, people might be
interested in you, but if not the chances are that no one, who doesn’t already
know you, is going to be interested in reading about you either. Do you go out
and buy autobiographies of people who have never done anything exceptional? Do you read books about people who have attained neither fame nor fortune? If you do, how many have you bought? Have
you read a dozen, a score, a-hundred-thousand? Believe me, the market for
autobiographies by John and Jane Doe is very limited indeed. In fact, it is
limited to about the number of copies John and Jane Doe are prepared to buy
themselves and try to give away.
“Writing
about what you know” does not, however, necessarily mean writing about
yourself. It can mean writing about a familiar environment, or abstracting from
personal experience to more universal experiences. In this sense, “writing
about what you know” can indeed be useful component in a finished product. The
point is simply that the finished product is unlikely to use this knowledge
one-to-one as in autobiography, but as part of a larger, more universally
appealing story.
In
short, while it is perfectly legitimate to try to learn writing skills without
a particular message in mind, no one should aspire to be a writer unless he/she
has something to say. In fact, no one
should aspire “to be a writer” at all because being a writer is meaningless;
the message is everything. Writing is a means to an end, not an end in itself. In
the same way, writing “about what you know” should be a means to an end: either
a way to learn writing skills or a way to deliver a more profound and universal
message in a convincing manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment